Nip Impressions logo
Sun, Dec 4, 2016 05:16
Visitor
Home
Click here for Pulp & Paper Radio International
Subscription Central
Items just for you
New publication added! Advertising Arguments 2015 book
Search
My Profile
Login
Logout
Management Side
Technical Side

Running a class operation

Jim,

I agree 100% on your views (regarding "History repeats itself").  I have seen all too many examples.

One is a mill with a rather over-sized aeration lagoon for effluent treatment, with half a dozen old-style aerators that float on a triangular set of 3 floats upside down.  When I enquired the department head advised that when one capsizes, the motor and gearbox are too damaged to be worth fixing.  They just install another aerator in and leave the old floater. Often for years I suspect that several finally sank, so are at least out of sight now

Same treatment system was eating a couple of million dollars per year in coagulant chemicals to try to settle out a couple of million dollars/year worth of lost coating material the should never have been discharged to sewer.  Also running twice the power cost for a well run effluent treatment system.

Same mill is in constant battle with the environmental regulator, with significant legal fees.

Recently they spent a couple of million to prevent the coating loss, under regulatory pressure, not because anyone in the mill smartened up.

Neil McCubbin

****

Have a comment? Send your email to jthompson@taii.com. Unless you tell us otherwise, we will assume we can use your name if we publish your letter.

 

Remember, if you please, to let your suppliers know you read Nip Impressions!

 


Printer-friendly format





Powered by Bondware
News Publishing Software

The browser you are using is outdated!

You may not be getting all you can out of your browsing experience
and may be open to security risks!

Consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser or choose on below: